Coverage & Requirements
How State Fidelity-Bond Requirements Differ
Compare common ways states define applicability, amounts, covered people, waivers, timing, and records.
Find Your Bond- Reading time
- 10 minute read
- Published
- Published
Applicability comes before arithmetic
A state may regulate condominiums and planned communities in different chapters. Formation date, number of units, residential use, expense level, statutory election, and who controls money may narrow the rule.
For example, Colorado's cited provision generally uses a 30-unit trigger and requires analysis of CCIOA status, community age, exemptions, and fund control. Delaware's DUCIOA framework contains formation-date and small-community qualifications. Neither should be reduced to a universal label.
Amount rules use different structures
California uses reserves plus three months of assessments for covered Davis-Stirling associations. Florida's cited HOA and condominium provisions use maximum funds in association or management-agent custody at one time. Delaware requires fidelity insurance to the extent reasonably available but states no dollar formula in the cited section.
Virginia uses a floor and a capped formula tied to reserves and annual assessment income. A method valid in one state may materially understate or overstate another state's rule.
| Structure | Official-source example | Key question |
|---|---|---|
| Reserves plus assessments | California | Which reserve and assessment figures apply? |
| Peak custody | Florida | What is the supportable highest expected balance? |
| Availability without formula | Delaware | How is amount selected and availability documented? |
| Floor and capped formula | Virginia | Were the floor, formula, and cap applied in order? |
People, perils, and waivers also differ
Some statutes list officers, directors, employees, managers, or everyone controlling or disbursing funds. Some expressly address computer or funds-transfer fraud. Others do not enumerate perils.
Waiver language is equally specific. Florida's Chapter 720 HOA provision allows an annual waiver through the described member vote, while its cited condominium provision has no parallel annual waiver. Oregon's official HOA and condominium provisions contain a post-turnover annual vote mechanism. Exact prerequisites matter.
- Never infer a waiver from silence.
- Do not transfer an HOA exception to a condominium provision.
- Check whether unavailability triggers notice rather than waiver.
- Record timing, vote, notice, and retention requirements.
Build a complete state comparison
For each potentially applicable provision, capture entity, applicability, amount, covered people and perils, waiver or exemption, timing, documentation, and ambiguity. Link directly to the official source and record the review date.
Use the current official text, association governing documents, and complete policy or bond wording together. Ask counsel to resolve uncertain applicability.
State-rule comparison checklist
- Classify the entity and verify statutory applicability.
- Record the formula exactly, including floor and cap.
- Capture covered people, perils, exceptions, and waivers.
- Check effective dates, notices, and record duties.
- Link the current official source and note unresolved ambiguity.
Sources
Official and institutional sources for this guide:
- Civil Code section 5806 — fidelity coverage
California Legislature · Cal. Civ. Code § 5806
- DUCIOA association insurance
Delaware General Assembly · 25 Del. C. § 81-313
- Property owners' association fidelity bond
Virginia General Assembly · Va. Code § 55.1-1827(B)
Next step: Compare jurisdictions
Open official-source summaries organized by jurisdiction.
Compare jurisdictions